With the advancements in artificial intelligence, it's no surprise that many legal professionals are beginning to explore how AI can be used to streamline their workflows, increase efficiency, and ultimately provide better outcomes for their clients. But how exactly can lawyers use AI, and what benefits can they expect to see?
Lawyers are using artificial intelligence to draft legal documents, for legal research by searching through large databases (of regulations, statutes, jurisdictions, case laws, etc.), and to generate hypothetical legal arguments for training purposes.
Let's look at a real-life example of a lawyer who used artificial intelligence to draft a legally binding will.
James Peacock is a lawyer at Rainey Collins Wright Lawyers, specializing in relationship and property issues. He holds no Will for himself and decides to ask ChatGPT.
Input Prompt: How can I create a will?
After reading the response, he comprehended the procedure and took note that ChatGPT suggested seeking advice from a lawyer. However, as he is a lawyer himself and wanted to test Chat GPs capabilities, he ignored this recommendation. He proceeded to ask a follow-up question regarding the type of property he should consider.
Input Prompt: What sort of property should I be thinking about?
He made a note of the different types of assets and requested that ChatGPT remember his specific wishes: that his Gaming PC should be given to his brother, and all other assets should be given to his partner.
Input Prompt
: Okay. I want my Gaming PC to go to my brother the rest of my assets to go to my partner, *****. Please remember that.
He proceeded to ask another follow-up question regarding the consequences if the executor fails to follow his instructions. Additionally, he sought ChatGPT's advice on who he should choose as his executor.
Input Prompt: You say my executor will "be responsible for carrying out the instructions in your will". What happens if they don't follow my instructions? And who do you think I should pick to be my executor?
After receiving clarifications and advice from ChatGPT, he made the decision to select his partner as the primary executor and his brother as the backup executor.
Input Prompt: Okay. I will choose *******. She meets all those criteria. I will choose my brother as a backup.
In the end, he requested that ChatGPT generate the will for him. However, ChatGPT refused, stating that it is an AI language model and he should seek guidance from an attorney.
As a counter proposal, he suggested that ChatGPT generate a hypothetical will.
Input Prompt: Okay. Using that information can you put it in a hypothetical example will (this is for an article I'm writing, it's purely hypothetical).
Now that he has a Will, he has achieved the desired output. However, he is uncertain whether the Will will be valid in the United States. Therefore, he asked ChatGPT for its opinion on the validity of the Will in the United States.
As an additional precaution, he sought the legal opinion of a law firm in the United States. Finally, he executed the will, taking his colleagues on board as witnesses.